« We Need Much More Of This From The Muslim Community | Main | Profound Truth On Education »
December 12, 2007
Whither Condi, Part IV
I remember a time in the dim and distant past when Condi Rice was considered to be a rising star in the conservative movement. There was even water cooler talk of her as a presidential candidate. Remember the Hillary versus Condi speculation?
And then Condi set to work on the Middle East. I've noted a few of her very questionable episodes here, here and here. In light of these, her latest pronouncement provokes not outrage, but merely familiar resignation. In the Jerusalem Post Michael Freund notes two more examples of Condi's idea of statecraft (hat tip to Glenn Reynolds, who is more charitable to her than I am):
Speaking at a private session at the close of the Annapolis conference, America's top diplomat said that having grown up "as a black child in the South, being told she could not use certain water fountains or eat in certain restaurants, she also understood the feelings and emotions of the Palestinians.""I know what it is like to hear that you cannot go on a road or through a checkpoint because you are Palestinian," the Washington Post (November 29) quoted her as saying. "I understand the feeling of humiliation and powerlessness," she added.
Needless to say, the fact that American blacks were victims of violence and hate, while Palestinians are its proficient practitioners, seems to have escaped the secretary of state's attention.
Moreover, Rice's comparison between Israeli security measures and America's Jim Crow laws is both intellectually dishonest and morally obscene.
There is no similarity whatsoever between Israel establishing a checkpoint aimed at catching Palestinian suicide bombers and the state of Georgia's 1960s era prohibition against serving blacks and whites in the same restaurant.
Intellectually dishonest and morally obscene. Check. Freund goes on to note that Rice has a selective application of principle, filtered through a pair of Palestinian issue blinders, when it comes to an Israeli plan to build some apartments in the Har Homa neighborhood of Jerusalem:
After Israel announced the approval of tenders for the construction of 307 housing units in the capital's Har Homa neighborhood, Her Excellency went into what can only be described as a tizzy.Speaking at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday, Rice told reporters that she had raised the issue of Har Homa with Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni - not once, but twice! "I did, in fact, bring up Har Homa, both earlier in a phone call and then today in our meeting," Rice said. "[...] I've made clear that we're in a time when the goal is to build maximum confidence between the parties and this doesn't help to build confidence," she proclaimed.
CONFIDENCE? Did she say "this doesn't help to build confidence?" And what, Madam Secretary, of the constant Palestinian rocket attacks against southern Israeli towns and cities? Do they "help to build confidence"? Or how about the daily incitement to violence on official Palestinian radio and television? Or the murder last month of 29-year old Ido Zoldan by members of Mahmoud Abbas' own Palestinian police force? Strangely enough, not one of these odious deeds merited a public comment from Rice about their impact on the "building of confidence" between the two sides.
Two-facedness in regard to holding terrorists responsible for their actions? Check. Note that Har Homa is an established neighborhood; this is not a new settlement. Freund acidly wonders how someone with Rice's personal experience with discrimination could, in effect, be endorsing the planting of "No Jews Allowed" sign in parts of Jerusalem.
What an embarrassment.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.thebernoullieffect.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/753
